What It Does
Aide Board is a configurable multi-expert deliberation platform. AI personas with domain expertise deliberate structured agendas using research-backed evidence, giving teams a horizontal capability across departments rather than a single-use tool.
Rather than a single application built for one workflow, Aide Board functions as a suite: the same deliberation engine configures to different meeting types and expert compositions depending on the decision at hand.
Why a Simulated Panel
Evidence work leans on expert interaction. People who have worked on one topic for a long time build up blind spots and biases, and outside experts help reduce them.
Advisory boards are the biggest example. Agencies also bring experts together to debate before a decision, for transparency and for decision making.
Bringing these groups together takes a lot of time, and depending on the size of the meeting it can cost quite a bit.
The aim is to hold that extra round of debate whenever you need it.
See It Work
The recorded demonstration runs the Model Review Board on one model, from choosing the panel to the finished report.
The model under review in this demonstration is an illustrative cost-utility model for atopic dermatitis, adapted from a published analysis. The treatment is called Treatment A.
How a Model Review Board Meeting Runs
Set up the panel
Aide Board runs expert meetings, each with a meeting type. The film uses the Model Review Board.
You choose the panel: a clinical expert, a health economist, a statistician and a chair. Each can be neutral, critical or favourable.
You upload the model under review, and type the focus areas you want the panel to examine.
Research and evidence review
The system first researches the background: the disease, the treatment landscape, past economic assessments, methods standards and statistical considerations.
It shows what it found, 63 web sources and 42 academic sources in the film. You review the list, see the agenda for the panel, and can add your own documents before continuing.
After you continue, the system builds an evidence lake, which is the meeting's knowledge base. It reads and catalogues every fact and passage from the model, the sources it found and your own documents, and puts them in one searchable store.
It is built once. The briefs, the deliberation and every later question then find the right evidence quickly. The knowledge base is open to the panel and to you, and it grounds the panel's statements in evidence.
Scoring and briefing
Each expert scores the model against a questionnaire: strengths, neutral points and weaknesses, with unscored items listed apart.
Each expert is then briefed for their role. The briefs are written from the evidence lake, for each agenda item and each domain.
The briefs stay open to read, and each one cites the sources behind its statements.
Deliberation
The panel deliberates in rounds, moderated by the chair. Experts question each other and the model's authors, respond to colleagues, and cite the evidence behind each statement.
In the film, the health economist puts questions in round two to the authors of the model, to the clinical expert and to the statistician.
When the evidence does not support a point, the chair says so. In the film it states that, in the documents it can access, it cannot find the share it was looking for.
Ask the panel
When deliberation ends, the full discussion stays on screen. You can ask the panel a question at any point, directed to one expert or to the chair, and the report can be generated at any time.
In the film the health economist is asked how far the ICER could move if responders lose response faster than the model assumes.
The answer opens by stating what the model does not report. It then draws on a related published model, and lists the sources behind it.
The report
When the questions are done, the board writes the report from the briefs, the deliberation and your questions.
The report opens with an executive summary, followed by what the model under review assumes. It can be downloaded as a Word file, and your questions are included.
Beyond Model Review
The film reviews a health-economic model. The same features can serve much broader objectives.
You can use the same approach for your own evidence package. Bring experts into a virtual room to critique it against the evidence. Upload your own materials and they become a database. Come back whenever you like to ask the experts questions or add more data. Once built, it stays accessible.
The first set-up can take up to an hour to an hour and a half, depending on how much the system reads. In the film it read over 100 sources, all PDFs with their figures and tables. After that, questions get quick answers, and you can add more data at any time.
Who It's For
Aide Board is built for medical affairs, HEOR, and market access teams that regularly need structured, multi-perspective input on a decision, evidence review, or strategic question, and today rely on convening real advisory boards or internal panels to get it.